Alcohol Compliance Survey, May 2009
Second Class Licenses
| County* | #Licensees |
Licensees that sold alcohol to minors |
Licensees that did not sell alcohol to minors |
| Addison |
10 | 1 | 10% |
9 | 90% |
| Bennington |
12 | 1 | 8% |
11 | 92% |
| Chittenden |
3 | 1 | 33% |
2 | 67% |
| Orange |
3 | 0 | 0% |
3 | 100% |
| Rutland |
11 | 0 | 0% |
11 | 100% |
| Windham |
12 | 0 | 0% |
12 | 100% |
| Windsor |
6 | 1 | 17% |
5 | 83% |
| TOTAL |
57 | 4 | 7% |
53 | 92% |
*Click on a county to see which licensees were tested
Of the 4 Second Class licensees who sold Alcohol products to a minor (17-20 years old), 3 requested valid photographic identification from the minor and made the sale;   1 did not ask for identification.