Alcohol Compliance Survey, June 2008
Second Class Licenses
| County* | #Licensees |
Licensees that sold alcohol to minors |
Licensees that did not sell alcohol to minors |
| Addison |
1 | 0 | 0% |
1 | 100% |
| Bennington |
4 | 1 | 25% |
3 | 75% |
| Caledonia |
10 | 1 | 10% |
9 | 90% |
| Chittenden |
10 | 0 | 0% |
10 | 100% |
| Orange |
9 | 2 | 22% |
7 | 78% |
| Rutland |
19 | 3 | 16% |
16 | 84% |
| Windsor |
11 | 1 | 9% |
10 | 91% |
| TOTAL |
64 | 8 | 13% |
56 | 88% |
*Click on a county to see which licensees were tested
Of the 8 Second Class licensees who sold Alcohol products to a minor (17-20 years old), 7 requested valid photographic identification from the minor and made the sale;   1 did not ask for identification.