| Home | Enforcement | Compliance Test Results | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Compliance Test ResultsAlcohol Compliance Survey, July 2006
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| County* | # Licensees | Licensees that sold alcohol to minors | Licensees that did not sell alcohol to minors | ||
| Addison | 5 | 0 | 0% | 5 | 100% |
| Bennington | 6 | 0 | 0% | 6 | 100% |
| Caledonia | 10 | 1 | 10% | 9 | 90% |
| Chittenden | 20 | 3 | 15% | 17 | 85% |
| Essex | 3 | 0 | 0% | 3 | 100% |
| Orange | 4 | 3 | 75% | 1 | 25% |
| Orleans | 7 | 1 | 14% | 6 | 86% |
| Rutland | 10 | 0 | 0% | 10 | 100% |
| Washington | 8 | 1 | 13% | 7 | 88% |
| Windham | 10 | 0 | 0% | 10 | 100% |
| Windsor | 4 | 1 | 25% | 3 | 75% |
| TOTAL | 87 | 10 | 11% | 77 | 89% |
Of the 10 Second Class licensees who sold Alcohol products to a minor (17-20 years old), 7 requested valid photographic identification from the minor and made the sale; 3 did not ask for identification.
 |
||||||||
|
