| Home | Enforcement | Compliance Test Results | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Compliance Test ResultsAlcohol Compliance Survey, May 2005
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| County* | # Licensees | Licensees that sold alcohol to minors | Licensees that did not sell alcohol to minors | ||
| Bennington | 8 | 1 | 13% | 7 | 88% |
| Caledonia | 3 | 0 | 0% | 3 | 100% |
| Chittenden | 12 | 3 | 25% | 9 | 75% |
| Essex | 1 | 0 | 0% | 1 | 100% |
| Lamoille | 5 | 3 | 60% | 2 | 40% |
| Orange | 4 | 1 | 25% | 3 | 75% |
| Orleans | 5 | 0 | 0% | 5 | 100% |
| Rutland | 14 | 1 | 7% | 13 | 93% |
| Washington | 8 | 4 | 50% | 4 | 50% |
| Windham | 4 | 0 | 0% | 4 | 100% |
| Windsor | 5 | 0 | 0% | 5 | 100% |
| TOTAL | 69 | 13 | 19% | 56 | 81% |
Of the 13 Second Class licensees who sold Alcohol products to a minor (17-20 years old), 6 requested valid photographic identification from the minor and made the sale; 7 did not ask for identification.
 |
||||||||
|
