| Home | Enforcement | Compliance Test Results | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Compliance Test ResultsAlcohol Compliance Survey, January 2005
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| County* | # Licensees | Licensees that sold alcohol to minors | Licensees that did not sell alcohol to minors | ||
| Addison | 5 | 0 | 0% | 5 | 100% |
| Bennington | 8 | 0 | 0% | 8 | 100% |
| Caledonia | 1 | 0 | 0% | 1 | 100% |
| Chittenden | 13 | 3 | 23% | 10 | 77% |
| Franklin | 15 | 0 | 0% | 15 | 100% |
| Orange | 9 | 2 | 22% | 7 | 78% |
| Orleans | 2 | 1 | 50% | 1 | 50% |
| Rutland | 11 | 3 | 27% | 8 | 73% |
| Washington | 8 | 0 | 0% | 8 | 100% |
| Windham | 12 | 5 | 42% | 7 | 58% |
| Windsor | 5 | 1 | 20% | 4 | 80% |
| TOTAL | 89 | 15 | 17% | 74 | 83% |
Of the 15 Second Class licensees who sold Alcohol products to a minor (17-20 years old), 5 requested valid photographic identification from the minor and made the sale; 10 did not ask for identification.
 |
||||||||
|
