Alcohol Compliance Survey, August 2004
First Class Licenses
| County |
# Licensees | Licensees that sold alcohol to minors |
Licensees that did not sell alcohol to minors |
| Bennington |
7 | 0 | 0.0% |
7 | 100.0% |
| Caledonia |
5 | 1 | 20.0% |
4 | 80.0% |
| Chittenden |
14 | 1 | 7.1% |
13 | 92.9% |
| Essex |
1 | 0 | 0.0% |
1 | 100.0% |
| Lamoille |
7 | 1 | 14.3% |
6 | 85.7% |
| Orange |
2 | 0 | 0.0% |
2 | 100.0% |
| Orleans |
6 | 0 | 0.0% |
6 | 100.0% |
| Rutland |
13 | 0 | 0.0% |
13 | 100.0% |
| Washington |
2 | 0 | 0.0% |
2 | 100.0% |
| Windham |
4 | 1 | 25.0% |
3 | 75.0% |
| Windsor |
6 | 1 | 16.7% |
5 | 83.3% |
| TOTAL |
67 | 5 |
7.5% | 62 |
92.5% |
Of the 5 First Class licensees who sold Alcohol products to a minor (17-20 years old), 2 requested valid photographic
identification from the minor and made the sale; 3 did not ask for identification.
