Alcohol Compliance Survey, July 2004
Second Class Licenses
| County |
# Licensees | Licensees that sold alcohol to minors |
Licensees that did not sell alcohol to minors |
| Addison |
8 | 1 | 12.5% |
7 | 87.5% |
| Bennington |
8 | 0 | 0.0% |
8 | 100.0% |
| Caledonia |
4 | 1 | 25.0% |
3 | 75.0% |
| Chittenden |
16 | 2 | 12.5% |
14 | 87.5% |
| Grand Isle |
1 | 0 | 0.0% |
1 | 100.0% |
| Lamoille |
7 | 1 | 14.3% |
6 | 85.7% |
| Orange |
4 | 1 | 25.0% |
3 | 75.0% |
| Orleans |
8 | 2 | 25.0% |
6 | 75.0% |
| Rutland |
11 | 3 | 27.3% |
8 | 72.7% |
| Washington |
8 | 2 | 25.0% |
6 | 75.0% |
| Windham |
8 | 3 | 37.5% |
5 | 62.5% |
| Windsor |
13 | 3 | 23.1% |
10 | 76.9% |
| TOTAL |
96 | 19 |
19.8% | 77 |
80.2% |
Of the 19 Second Class licensees who sold Alcohol products to a minor (17-20 years old), 9 requested valid photographic
identification from the minor and made the sale; 10 did not ask for identification.
