Alcohol Compliance Survey, June 2004
First Class Licenses
| County |
# Licensees | Licensees that sold alcohol to minors |
Licensees that did not sell alcohol to minors |
| Addison |
6 | 1 | 16.7% |
5 | 83.3% |
| Bennington |
5 | 0 | 0.0% |
5 | 100.0% |
| Caledonia |
5 | 0 | 0.0% |
5 | 100.0% |
| Chittenden |
9 | 4 | 44.4% |
5 | 55.6% |
| Franklin |
4 | 2 | 50.0% |
2 | 50.0% |
| Lamoille |
1 | 0 | 0.0% |
1 | 100.0% |
| Orange |
1 | 0 | 0.0% |
1 | 100.0% |
| Orleans |
5 | 0 | 0.0% |
5 | 100.0% |
| Rutland |
7 | 0 | 0.0% |
7 | 100.0% |
| Washington |
7 | 0 | 0.0% |
7 | 100.0% |
| Windham |
10 | 1 | 10.0% |
9 | 90.0% |
| Windsor |
5 | 0 | 0.0% |
5 | 100.0% |
| TOTAL |
65 | 8 |
12.3% | 57 |
87.7% |
Of the 8 First Class licensees who sold Alcohol products to a minor (17-20 years old), 4 requested valid photographic
identification from the minor and made the sale;   4 did not ask for identification.