Alcohol Compliance Survey, April 2004
First Class Licenses
| County |
# Licensees | Licensees that sold alcohol to minors |
Licensees that did not sell alcohol to minors |
| Bennington |
3 | 2 | 66.7% |
1 | 33.3% |
| Caledonia |
6 | 0 | 0.0% |
6 | 100.0% |
| Chittenden |
13 | 2 | 15.4% |
11 | 84.6% |
| Essex |
1 | 0 | 0.0% |
1 | 100.0% |
| Franklin |
3 | 0 | 0.0% |
3 | 100.0% |
| Grand Isle |
1 | 0 | 0.0% |
1 | 100.0% |
| Lamoille |
3 | 0 | 0.0% |
3 | 100.0% |
| Orleans |
6 | 3 | 50.0% |
3 | 50.0% |
| Rutland |
14 | 5 | 35.7% |
9 | 64.3% |
| Washington |
10 | 2 | 20.0% |
8 | 80.0% |
| Windham |
5 | 0 | 0.0% |
5 | 100.0% |
| Windsor |
6 | 0 | 0.0% |
6 | 100.0% |
| TOTAL |
71 | 14 |
19.7% | 57 |
80.3% |
Of the 14 First Class licensees who sold Alcohol products to a minor (17-20 years old), 5 requested valid photographic
identification from the minor and made the sale; 9 did not ask for identification.
