Alcohol Compliance Survey, March 2004
Second Class Licenses
| County |
# Licensees | Licensees that sold alcohol to minors |
Licensees that did not sell alcohol to minors |
| Addison |
9 | 1 | 11.1% |
8 | 88.9% |
| Bennington |
7 | 2 | 28.6% |
5 | 71.4% |
| Caledonia |
5 | 0 | 0.0% |
5 | 100.0% |
| Chittenden |
8 | 2 | 25.0% |
6 | 75.0% |
| Essex |
1 | 0 | 0.0% |
1 | 100.0% |
| Franklin |
3 | 0 | 0.0% |
3 | 100.0% |
| Grand Isle |
4 | 0 | 0.0% |
4 | 100.0% |
| Lamoille |
6 | 0 | 0.0% |
6 | 100.0% |
| Orange |
4 | 2 | 50.0% |
2 | 50.0% |
| Orleans |
8 | 2 | 25.0% |
6 | 75.0% |
| Rutland |
14 | 5 | 35.7% |
9 | 64.3% |
| Washington |
5 | 2 | 40.0% |
3 | 60.0% |
| Windham |
6 | 1 | 16.7% |
5 | 83.3% |
| Windsor |
10 | 2 | 20.0% |
8 | 80.0% |
| TOTAL |
90 | 19 |
21.1% | 71 |
78.9% |
Of the 19 Second Class licensees who sold Alcohol products to a minor (17-20 years old), 11 requested valid photographic
identification from the minor and made the sale; 8 did not ask for identification.
