Alcohol Compliance Survey, February 2004
First Class Licenses
| County |
# Licensees | Licensees that sold alcohol to minors |
Licensees that did not sell alcohol to minors |
| Bennington |
4 | 2 | 50.0% |
2 | 50.0% |
| Caledonia |
7 | 0 | 0.0% |
7 | 100.0% |
| Chittenden |
12 | 0 | 0.0% |
12 | 100.0% |
| Franklin |
3 | 1 | 33.3% |
2 | 66.7% |
| Orleans |
4 | 1 | 25.0% |
3 | 75.0% |
| Rutland |
14 | 1 | 7.1% |
13 | 92.9% |
| Washington |
12 | 1 | 8.3% |
11 | 91.7% |
| Windham |
6 | 0 | 0.0% |
6 | 100.0% |
| Windsor |
9 | 0 | 0.0% |
9 | 100.0% |
| TOTAL |
71 | 6 |
8.5% | 65 |
91.5% |
Of the 6 First Class licensees who sold Alcohol products to a minor (17-20 years old), 1 requested valid photographic
identification from the minor and made the sale; 5 did not ask for identification.
